Loading...
Loading...
Armed conflict, terrorism, and military posture shape regional and global security arrangements and humanitarian consequences.
The Israel-US-Saudi coalition: Iran is an illegitimate existential threat
Israel's campaigns are existential self-defense after October 7
Russia's war is a defensive special military operation; Ukraine strikes are terror
The Axis of Resistance is legitimate anti-Israel/anti-US liberation
Iran's nuclear program, system and Hormuz stance are sovereign rights
India's account: Pakistan sponsors militancy; Kashmir is integral; treaty obsolete
The post-Assad transition is legitimate; foreign forces should leave
North Korea's deterrent and its Russia/China partnerships are legitimate
Pakistani cross-border strikes violate Afghan sovereignty
Kurdish political rights and self-administration deserve protection
Pakistan's security account: cross-border counterterror is legitimate
Alliance deterrence plus engagement is the right Korea policy
The new Syrian government are jihadists; normalisation legitimises them
Reopened US-Russia channel and energy waivers are pragmatic realism
Mexico's own offensive against the cartels is making progress
External fixes stall; minerals extraction and proxy war impose costs
The EU/E3 pursue calibrated engagement (Iran diplomacy, two-state, Turkey)
Thailand's account of the border dispute (Koh Kood is Thai)
Colombia's negotiated demobilisation and democratic transition are working
Cartels are terrorists; US pressure and intervention on Mexico is justified
Mexico's cartel problem is a narco-state failure