Press TV · January 2026

• frames Trump as aggressor or threat (warns, threatens, botched plot, insane attack)
• uses distancing and delegitimising language (claims, says, seen as bid, reportedly)
• highlights opposition and rejection of Trump from multiple international actors
• includes sensational accusations (rape, murder, compromised by Israel)

The outlet is Iranian state media, which has an adversarial relationship with Trump. The coverage is uniformly negative, with no neutral or positive headlines. The entity's own statements are reported with skepticism or as threats, and the outlet amplifies accusations and condemnations from others.

• Quotes Iranian officials as authoritative voices
• Frames Iran as victim of foreign aggression
• Emphasizes Iranian strength and resilience
• Uses valorizing language for Iranian figures and actions

The outlet consistently amplifies Iranian government and military perspectives without critical distance, treating Iran as a unified, righteous actor. Headlines that quote Iranian officials threatening or condemning others do not indicate a negative stance toward Iran; rather, they reinforce the outlet's positive framing of Iran as a strong, principled nation.

• portrays US/Trump as aggressive, criminal, or irrational
• uses evaluative adjectives like 'insane', 'unhinged', 'botched', 'blatant'
• amplifies foreign and domestic critics of US actions
• frames US policy as threats, plots, or failures

The entity is 'US' but coverage overwhelmingly focuses on Trump administration; the outlet's own voice is uniformly negative, using loaded language and quoting adversaries without counterbalance.

• portrays Israel as orchestrating covert attacks and riots in Iran
• uses terms like 'Mossad-backed', 'terror cell', 'Mossad terrorists' to frame Israel as a malicious actor
• highlights international condemnation and internal crises of Israel
• associates Israel with negative actions (e.g., 'permit warfare', 'incitement to genocide')

The outlet consistently frames Israel as an aggressor and destabilizing force, using charged language and attributing negative events to Israeli intelligence. No positive or neutral coverage of Israel is present.

• frames Israeli actions as violations and crimes
• quotes Hamas officials authoritatively without distancing
• uses emotionally charged language about Gaza suffering
• highlights Palestinian victimhood and resistance

The outlet's stance is positive toward PS (Palestinian side, including Hamas) as it consistently amplifies Hamas statements as credible, criticizes Israeli and US actions, and uses sympathetic framing for Palestinian suffering. The entity PS is treated as a legitimate actor whose grievances and positions are reported without skepticism.