Loading...
El Mundo · February 2026
February 2026 editorial profile for El Mundo. Below: how this outlet framed the actors and regions it covered most in February 2026. Tap any tile to jump to the detailed card.
TRUMP25 titles-1Skeptical“critical but not uniformly hostile”
Patterns
- uses distancing or evaluative verbs like 'eclipsa', 'arremete', 'amenaza'
- frames Trump's actions as controversial or overreaching (e.g., 'tumba los aranceles', 'extralimitó')
- includes negative quotes from critics (e.g., victim calling Trump a traitor)
- occasionally reports Trump's statements neutrally or as direct quotes
Caveats
Several headlines quote Trump directly without overt editorializing (e.g., #4, #14, #22), which slightly tempers the negative stance. However, the outlet's own framing often highlights conflict, failure, or criticism (e.g., 'eclipsa', 'tumba', 'sin lograr ningún acuerdo definitivo'). The inclusion of a victim's accusation (#13) and the negative characterization of his Greenland ambitions (#1) reinforce a skeptical-critical tone overall.
Representative headlines
- →Trump eclipsa la presentación de su Junta de Paz sin apenas mencionar Gazaes
- →Trump, enfurecido, arremete contra el Supremo por los aranceles: "Es profundamente decepcionante y me avergüenzo de ciertos jueces por no tener el coraje de hacer lo que es correcto" son "perros falderos"es
- →El Tribunal Supremo tumba los aranceles de Trump al considerar que se extralimitó en sus competenciases
- →Una de las víctimas de Jeffrey Epstein: "Tenía 16 años cuando abusó de mí, mis amigos me llevaron a su casa. Trump nos ha traicionado"es
United States25 titles-1Skeptical“critical and skeptical”
Patterns
- foregrounds Trump's controversies and failures
- uses distancing verbs and critical framing for Trump actions
- highlights negative consequences of US policies
- includes Epstein scandal repeatedly to associate with US figures
Caveats
Stance is toward the US as a country, but coverage is heavily focused on Trump administration actions and scandals, with critical framing. Some headlines are neutral or positive (e.g., 19, 20), but overall tone is skeptical of US leadership and policies.
Representative headlines
- →El Tribunal Supremo tumba los aranceles de Trump al considerar que se extralimitó en sus competenciases
- →Trump destroza la confianza de los estadounidenses en las elecciones y la alternancia y desata las alarmas de cara a las 'midterms' de noviembrees
- →Varios medios afirman que el Gobierno de EEUU omitió archivos del expediente Epstein que mencionan a Trumpes
Spain25 titles0Reportorial“neutral reporting with mixed domestic political focus”
Patterns
- entity appears mostly as geographic setting or administrative unit
- headlines focus on local politics, disasters, and infrastructure
- no consistent evaluative language toward the entity itself
Caveats
Entity is a country (Spain) but coverage is overwhelmingly domestic political news; the entity is not consistently framed positively or negatively, rather used as a backdrop for partisan conflict and events.
Representative headlines
- →Pedro Sánchez se desplaza de urgencia a Andalucía, con Grazalema en riesgo por desplomes "catastróficos" y más de 7.000 evacuados tras el azote de 'Leonardo'es
- →Madrid alcanzará los ocho millones de habitantes en 2039: "Hay que evitar el efecto llamada que se está produciendo como consecuencia de las regularizaciones masivas del Gobierno"es
- →Adif suprime los últimos trenes del día en la línea Madrid-Barcelona para realizar las operaciones de mantenimientoes
EPSTEIN21 titles-2Adversarial“consistently hostile and delegitimising”
Patterns
- labels Epstein as 'pedophile' and 'sexual predator' in headlines
- associates Epstein with scandal, crisis, and criminal networks
- uses framing that treats Epstein as a toxic figure whose connections damage others
- quotes victims and critics without giving Epstein a platform
Caveats
Headline 9 quotes Epstein's self-defense ('I am not the devil'), but the outlet frames it as an 'unpublished interview' and the surrounding coverage overwhelmingly condemns him. The entity is dead, so stance is toward his legacy; coverage is uniformly negative.