Reforma · September 2026

• distancing attribution verbs ('Afirman que', 'Reportan', 'dice') for Trump's claims
• foregrounding of controversies and gaffes (map of 'New America', 'traición' photo, AI memes)
• critical framing of Trump's actions toward Mexico (cartels, trade, wolf protection)
• ironic/negative selection: 'Trump y Xi están más débiles', 'choque con medios'

Coverage is mixed: some headlines are neutral or even positive (e.g., 'Impresiona en China trato de Trump a Xi', 'Apoyan mexicanos política antinarco de Trump'). The outlet does not consistently delegitimise Trump, but its own vocabulary and story selection lean critical/skeptical. No headline uses overtly hostile epithets, so -1 rather than -2.

• Mocking framing of Trump's personal conduct (social media volume, ballroom tours, AI memes)
• Highlighting provocative or dismissive statements toward Mexico ('solo tiene tamales y tomates', 'parte de EU', 'New America')
• Critical coverage of media censorship and institutional pressure (vetoed outlets, FCC threats, 'No a la censura')
• Selection of stories that emphasize Trump's disruptive or unilateral actions

Coverage is mixed: some headlines are neutral or factual (e.g., meetings with Xi, Chevron-ENI deal, Fed policy). The negative stance is inferred from a subset of mocking or critical headlines, not uniform across all 25. The entity is 'US (country)', but most headlines focus on Trump; the outlet's stance toward the US as a whole may be more neutral than toward Trump personally.

• Neutral attribution of official actions ('Rinde Sheinbaum Segundo Informe', 'Entregan Segundo Informe')
• Critical framing of government legacy ('Desaparece megafarmacia de AMLO en informe')
• Sovereignty-defensive headlines quoting officials ('México no es colonia de nadie', 'Sheinbaum rechaza presión de EU')
• Coverage of security cooperation and bilateral friction without editorializing

The bundle mixes neutral reporting of Mexican government actions with occasional critical framing of policy outcomes (e.g., megafarmacia disappearance). Headlines quoting Sheinbaum defending sovereignty are reported without distancing verbs, but this reflects the entity's own stance toward the US, not Reforma's stance toward Mexico. No consistent evaluative vocabulary about Mexico as a country; coverage is largely factual and institution-focused.

• Attribution verbs are neutral-reporting ('dice', 'asegura', 'pide', 'promete', 'presume') rather than distancing or endorsing
• Selection mixes routine governance items (informe, grito, visitas, llamada con Trump) with friction stories (vacío en Querétaro, abucheos, irrupción de normalistas, desaparición de megafarmacia)
• No evaluative framing vocabulary applied to Sheinbaum herself; criticism is embedded in quoted third parties or event descriptions
• Coverage is dominated by her official agenda and public acts, treated as newsworthy without lionising or delegitimising

Bundle is largely straight news reporting of Sheinbaum's official activities; the few negative-leaning headlines (vacío, abucheos, irrupción, megafarmacia) describe events or third-party actions rather than Reforma's own hostile framing of her. No consistent editorial stance toward her is detectable, so 0 with medium confidence is appropriate; a larger or more opinion-heavy sample could shift this.