Reforma · June 2026

• Uses neutral verbs like 'dice', 'afirma', 'anuncia' to report Trump's statements
• Frames Trump as a central actor in international negotiations and domestic policy
• Occasionally includes critical or skeptical framing from other actors (AMLO, Newsom, Ebrard)
• No consistent evaluative vocabulary about Trump himself

Coverage is largely factual, quoting Trump's statements without strong editorial judgment. Some headlines report criticism of Trump by others (e.g., AMLO, Newsom), but the outlet itself does not adopt a hostile or celebratory tone. The entity's own aggressive or controversial statements are reported neutrally, not framed as negative by the outlet.

• Frequent use of Sheinbaum's initials (CSP) and direct quotes presented without distancing verbs
• Headlines often highlight government actions and agreements as positive developments
• Occasional critical or neutral items (protests, investigations) balance the positive framing
• Quotes from officials (Ebrard, Monreal) amplify government positions

The entity is the country MX, but most headlines focus on the government/Sheinbaum. The outlet generally treats the administration as credible and authoritative, quoting them directly and framing their actions positively. However, there are neutral/negative items (protests, investigations, Vallarta case) that prevent a +2. The quoted content sometimes criticizes the US, but the outlet itself is not hostile to MX.

• Frequent use of 'Trump' as the primary actor, often in assertive or threatening contexts
• Headlines highlight US pressure, threats, and unilateral actions (e.g., 'amenaza', 'embestida', 'dificulta')
• Quotes from Trump are often paired with verbs like 'afirma', 'dice', 'amenaza' that convey assertion but not endorsement
• Selection includes critical responses from other leaders (AMLO, Newsom) and legal setbacks (judge blocking Trump)

The outlet reports Trump's statements and actions factually, but the framing emphasizes conflict, threats, and negative consequences (e.g., trade disputes, immigration restrictions, cartel accusations). Some headlines are neutral (e.g., #6, #9), and the entity is the US as a country, not just Trump, but most coverage centers on Trump's behavior. The outlet does not celebrate US actions; it highlights friction and criticism from other actors, suggesting a skeptical stance toward the US administration.