Loading...
New York Post · July 2026
July 2026 editorial profile for New York Post. Below: how this outlet framed the actors and regions it covered most in July 2026. Tap any tile to jump to the detailed card.
TRUMP25 titles+1Constructive“supportive but not uniformly celebratory”
Patterns
- Foregrounds Trump's actions and decisions as consequential and often positive
- Uses favorable framing for Trump administration policies (e.g., 'wisely pushing')
- Amplifies Trump's statements and threats without distancing verbs
- Includes some critical or neutral items, but overall selection favors Trump
Caveats
Several headlines are neutral or factual (e.g., #1, #4, #22), and #5 and #24 highlight media criticism of Trump, which could be seen as sympathetic to him. However, #15 and #20 report on Trump's aggressive actions without evaluative distance, and #18 uses 'wisely' to endorse his policy. The outlet's own voice is generally favorable, though not uniformly celebratory.
Representative headlines
- →Trump trumpets tariffs, signs a Corvette, and tells Michigan autoworkers: ‘I’ve done more for you than your parents’
- →Trump tells The Post he’s ‘left instructions’ should Iran assassinate him: ‘Bomb them at levels’ never seen before
- →Team Trump is wisely pushing for most illegal migrants to go home voluntarily
United States25 titles+1Constructive“supportive of US actions and officials, critical of opponents”
Patterns
- Frames US government actions as decisive and positive ('wisely pushing')
- Uses adversarial language toward critics of US/Trump ('blames Trump', 'goes off on')
- Highlights threats to US interests with alarmist framing
- Amplifies Republican/Trump-aligned voices as authoritative
Caveats
The outlet's stance is toward the US as an entity, but coverage is heavily filtered through Trump administration actions and Republican perspectives. Positive framing of US policies (e.g., immigration, Iran) is offset by neutral reporting on domestic political races. The entity's own aggressive statements (e.g., Trump's Iran threat) are reported without distancing, suggesting alignment. However, some headlines (e.g., #3, #17) include criticism of US political actors, but these are framed as attacks on Democrats or fringe figures, not on the US itself.
MAMDANI20 titles-2Adversarial“hostile and delegitimizing”
Patterns
- Uses pejorative labels like 'sleazeball' and 'delusional'
- Frames actions as 'broken promises', 'abuse of power', 'stonewalls'
- Highlights opposition from business, Jewish groups, police, and critics
- Emphasizes failures and controversies over any policy achievements
Caveats
The outlet consistently frames Mamdani negatively, using loaded language and amplifying critics. Even when reporting his statements, it distances itself with 'critics slam' and 'skewers'. The entity's own controversial positions (e.g., Netanyahu arrest) are presented as reckless, not as legitimate policy.
Representative headlines