Loading...
Fox News · February 2026
February 2026 editorial profile for Fox News. Below: how this outlet framed the actors and regions it covered most in February 2026. Tap any tile to jump to the detailed card.
TRUMP25 titles+1Constructive“supportive and amplifying”
Patterns
- Foregrounds Trump's policy wins and initiatives
- Quotes Trump authoritatively without distancing verbs
- Frames critics as partisan or out-of-touch
- Uses positive or neutral framing for Trump's actions
Caveats
Headlines 4, 14, 18, 21, 22, 23 include criticism or opposition, but these are attributed to others (House Republicans, Greenland, France, Democrats, Whoopi) and do not reflect Fox News' own stance toward Trump; the outlet's editorial voice consistently treats Trump as credible and authoritative.
Representative headlines
- →US tariff revenue up 300% under Trump as Supreme Court battle looms
- →Trump slams Maryland governor, launches federal effort to protect Potomac after historic sewage spill
- →Trump's next move in Iran could be 'most important decision' of his presidency: Hugh Hewitt
- →Mother of woman found dead in illegal's dumpster reveals Trump's three-word message to her
- →Trump defends Minneapolis federal enforcement, says crime plunged after ‘thousands of criminals’ removed
EPSTEIN25 titles-2Adversarial“consistently hostile and delegitimizing”
Patterns
- associates Epstein with criminal and scandalous activities
- uses negative framing like 'evil exploits', 'compromising', 'vulgar'
- focuses on Epstein's network and fallout as a scandal
- portrays Epstein as a central figure in a web of corruption
Caveats
The outlet's stance is toward Epstein as a deceased criminal figure; coverage is uniformly negative, treating him as a source of scandal and evil, with no sympathetic or neutral framing.
United States25 titles+1Constructive“favourable toward US government and Trump administration”
Patterns
- foregrounds Trump administration achievements and actions
- uses positive framing for US officials and policies
- frames US as strong and proactive
- occasional neutral reporting on US-related events
Caveats
The outlet's stance is toward the US as a country, but coverage heavily focuses on the Trump administration, which is treated positively. Some headlines are neutral or mixed, and a few mention US entities in a neutral or critical context (e.g., Greenland rejecting proposal). The positive stance is driven by selection and framing of US government actions.
Iran18 titles-1Skeptical“skeptical and adversarial”
Patterns
- frames Iran as aggressor or threat
- highlights regime vulnerability and power struggles
- uses distancing language for Iranian officials
- amplifies US/Israeli perspectives and warnings
Caveats
The outlet consistently treats Iran as a hostile actor and its leadership as illegitimate or dangerous, but stops short of outright delegitimizing language like 'regime' in every headline; the stance is skeptical/critical rather than purely hostile.