Loading...
Die Presse · February 2026
February 2026 editorial profile for Die Presse. Below: how this outlet framed the actors and regions it covered most in February 2026. Tap any tile to jump to the detailed card.
TRUMP25 titles-1Skeptical“critical but not uniformly hostile”
Patterns
- negative framing of Trump's actions and policies
- quoting Trump's controversial statements with distancing effect
- highlighting conflicts and criticisms from others
- occasional neutral or mixed coverage of policy moves
Caveats
Several headlines report Trump's actions neutrally (e.g., 3, 12, 20, 24), and headline 13 is positive toward Trump. However, the majority frame his policies negatively or quote critics, and the outlet's own vocabulary ('empört sich', 'rassistisches Video', 'beleidigt') signals skepticism. The overall stance is critical but not consistently hostile; some coverage is factual or mixed.
Representative headlines
- →Trump macht Leben teurer: Demokratische Antwort auf Rede zur Lage der Nationde
- →„Keinerlei Scham“: Obama äußert sich erstmals zu Trumps Affen-Videode
- →„Schlimmste Reporterin“: Trump beleidigt Journalistin nach Frage zu Epstein-Aktende
- →Die Nagelprobe für Trumps Gaza-Plande
- →Wie stark haben Trumps Zölle Österreich getroffen? Neue Zahlen geben die Antwortde
Austria25 titles0Reportorial“neutral reporting with mixed domestic coverage”
Patterns
- factual reporting of events without evaluative language toward AT
- domestic political actors quoted or described with neutral framing
- no consistent positive or negative editorial voice about the country itself
Caveats
Headlines cover a wide range of topics (crime, politics, economy, sports) without a unified stance toward Austria as an entity. Some headlines involve criticism of Austrian politicians (e.g., Gewessler, Kickl) but these target individuals, not the country. The outlet's own voice is largely neutral, with no systematic praise or condemnation of Austria.
Representative headlines
United States25 titles-1Skeptical“critical and skeptical”
Patterns
- negative framing of Trump's actions and statements
- highlighting controversies and conflicts involving the US
- use of evaluative language ('wirre Drohungen', 'macht Leben teurer')
- focus on US domestic and foreign policy problems
Caveats
The outlet's stance is primarily directed at the Trump administration rather than the US as a whole; some headlines are neutral or factual (e.g., 5, 13, 18, 20, 22). The entity 'US' is often represented through Trump, whose actions are consistently criticized, but the coverage also includes non-Trump items that are more neutral.
Germany17 titles0Reportorial“neutral with mixed framing”
Patterns
- factual reporting of German political figures' actions
- occasional critical framing of German politicians' missions
- neutral coverage of German corporate and cultural events
Caveats
Coverage is largely neutral and factual, but headline 6 ('unmöglicher Mission') introduces mild skepticism toward Merz's China trip, while headline 1 quotes a German minister criticizing France, which is neutral toward DE. Overall, no consistent positive or negative stance toward the country as a whole.