Corriere della Sera · June 2026

• Frequent use of Trump's name in headlines with negative or mocking framing (attacks, irritability, 'sparate')
• Highlighting Trump's setbacks and controversies (Supreme Court losses, G7 snubs, tariff accusations)
• Neutral reporting on US institutions and companies (SpaceX, Nvidia) separate from Trump
• Occasional neutral/positive coverage of US diplomacy (Iran talks, G7 welcome)

The entity is 'US' but coverage focuses overwhelmingly on Trump, whose actions are often framed critically (e.g., 'sparate', 'mette a rischio', 'dice no'). However, some headlines treat US diplomacy neutrally or positively (Iran talks, G7 welcome), and non-Trump US entities (SpaceX, Nvidia) are covered favorably. The negative stance is toward Trump specifically, not the US as a whole, so the score is -1 rather than -2.

• Quotes Meloni authoritatively as a stateswoman setting policy lines
• Frames her as a victim of Trump's attacks, with solidarity gestures from Italian institutions
• Uses her own words to rebut Trump, giving her the last word
• Highlights her strategic moves (G7, bilateral summit, Alpini rally) as legitimate leadership

The outlet reports Trump's attacks and Conte's criticism, but its own framing consistently treats Meloni as credible and sympathetic, amplifying her rebuttals and institutional support. The positive stance is moderate, not celebratory; some headlines are neutral factual reporting.

• Uses distancing and evaluative verbs like 'bocciato', 'attacco', 'sparate', 'schiaffo' to frame Trump's actions negatively
• Highlights conflicts and controversies involving Trump (with Meloni, Netanyahu, courts, Senate)
• Quotes Trump's aggressive or boastful statements, often with ironic or critical framing
• Balances some neutral reporting of events (G7, celebrations) with critical selection of failures and clashes

The outlet often reports Trump's own words and actions factually, but the selection and vocabulary (e.g., 'bocciato', 'attacco', 'sparate') lean critical. Some headlines are neutral or even positive (e.g., military flyover, G7 welcome), but the overall pattern skews skeptical. The entity's quoted content is often aggressive toward others, but the outlet's framing of Trump himself is critical, not favorable.

• frames Trump's attacks as unjustified and Meloni's response as dignified
• uses supportive descriptors like 'sano orgoglio nazionale' and 'la nostra forza'
• highlights Meloni's availability to testify and her condemnation of offensive posts
• reports her statements without distancing verbs, treating her as authoritative

The entity is Italy's PM, and coverage is largely event-driven; some headlines are neutral (e.g., meetings, condolences). The positive stance is most evident in the Trump-Meloni conflict, where the outlet amplifies Meloni's rebuttals and criticizes Trump's behavior, but it does not uniformly lionize her across all topics.

• Uses distancing and delegitimizing labels like 'zar' and 'criminale'
• Highlights Putin's failures, contradictions, and internal problems
• Frames Putin's actions as terror or intimidation rather than policy
• Occasionally neutral or even slightly favorable when quoting Putin directly

Some headlines (e.g., 1, 2, 14) quote Putin or his associates without overt editorializing, which slightly offsets the negative framing. The outlet's own vocabulary ('zar', 'criminale', 'terrore') and selection of negative stories (drone attacks, gas disputes, internal difficulties) tilt the stance toward skepticism/criticism, but not uniformly hostile.