i24NEWS · January 2026

• Amplifies Israeli officials' statements as authoritative
• Frames Israeli military actions as justified retaliation
• Reports Israeli diplomatic moves positively
• Includes some critical coverage of internal scandals

Headlines 5, 6, 13, and 20 show the outlet also reports criticism of Israeli officials and internal controversies, but the overall framing of Israel as a state actor is positive, with military and diplomatic actions presented as legitimate. The entity is the country, not a specific government, so internal scandals do not shift the overall stance toward the country itself.

• Trump as decision-maker and initiator
• Trump's actions and statements reported without distancing
• Focus on Trump's strategic moves and influence
• Occasional critical framing of Trump's targets

Headlines report Trump's actions and statements neutrally or with implied authority, but some (e.g., 18, 20) include critical context from others. The outlet does not use overtly hostile language toward Trump, and often presents him as a key actor shaping events, which leans positive. However, the bundle lacks celebratory or promotional framing, and some headlines (e.g., 2, 22) show resistance to his policies, which tempers the stance.

• reports US actions and statements factually
• includes critical quotes from other actors
• uses Trump's name prominently in headlines
• covers both US initiatives and controversies

Coverage is largely factual reporting of US actions and statements, with some headlines quoting criticism from other actors (e.g., Israeli officials, EU members) but without the outlet's own evaluative language toward the US. The entity is the US as a country, not a single administration, and the bundle includes both positive (e.g., AI pact) and negative (e.g., funding cuts, controversial plans) items, resulting in a neutral overall stance.

• reports Hamas actions and statements without evaluative framing
• uses neutral attribution verbs like 'says', 'reportedly', 'claims'
• covers Israeli and US perspectives alongside Palestinian ones
• focuses on ceasefire, governance, and security arrangements

The entity is a country (PS), not a single actor; coverage is largely factual about Hamas and Palestinian Authority actions, with no consistent positive or negative editorial stance toward the state or its institutions. Headlines about Hamas are neutral or report its statements without endorsement or hostility, and coverage of Israeli actions is similarly factual.