Anadolu Agency · April 2026

• foregrounds Iranian casualties and damage from US-Israeli strikes
• amplifies Iranian official statements without distancing verbs
• frames US actions as ultimatums, blockades, and attacks
• highlights Iranian diplomatic proposals and resistance

Headlines are largely factual but consistently select Iranian perspectives and victimization, while US actions are described as aggressive (ultimatums, strikes, blockades). Iran's own statements are reported without skepticism, and its military claims (e.g., shooting down drone) are presented neutrally. No headlines criticize Iran or use distancing language toward it.

• straightforward news headlines without evaluative adjectives toward Turkey
• Turkey mentioned as actor in diplomatic or critical statements
• no positive or negative framing of Turkey itself

The entity is Turkey (TR), not President Erdogan or the Turkish government specifically; coverage is mostly factual and Turkey appears as a diplomatic actor. Headlines 2 and 20 report Turkey's criticism of Netanyahu, but the outlet does not endorse or condemn Turkey's stance—it simply reports the statement. No headlines frame Turkey positively or negatively.

• Quotes critics and opponents of US actions
• Highlights negative consequences of US policies
• Frames US leadership as aggressive or erratic
• Amplifies foreign condemnation of US

The outlet consistently reports on US actions with a critical slant, often quoting domestic and international critics, and highlighting negative outcomes. While the coverage is not uniformly hostile, the selection and framing lean toward skepticism and disapproval of US policies and leadership.

• Quotes critics and opponents of Trump
• Highlights controversy and backlash
• Uses distancing verbs like 'says' and 'sparks speculation'
• Foregrounds negative reactions from foreign officials and domestic critics

The outlet does not use overtly hostile language itself, but the selection heavily emphasizes criticism of Trump from other actors, creating a skeptical framing. Trump's own statements are reported neutrally, but the surrounding headlines amplify negative reactions.

• foregrounds Israeli attacks on Lebanon as the primary action
• reports Hezbollah attacks as reactive or defensive
• uses neutral or factual language for Hezbollah actions, no distancing verbs
• includes international criticism of Israel's operation in Lebanon

The outlet consistently frames Israel as the aggressor and Lebanon/Hezbollah as responding, which implies a positive stance toward Lebanon as a victim. However, the entity is a country (Lebanon) rather than a specific actor, and coverage focuses on military events without explicit praise or celebration of Lebanon itself.

• foregrounds Israeli military losses and civilian casualties
• highlights Israeli internal political conflict and criticism of Netanyahu
• reports Israeli actions as aggressive or illegal (e.g., 'storming', 'ramming')
• amplifies international and Turkish condemnation of Israel

The outlet is Anadolu Agency, a Turkish state news agency; Turkey has a well-known adversarial relationship with Israel. The coverage consistently frames Israel negatively, focusing on casualties, internal dissent, and condemnation by others, with no positive or neutral framing of Israeli actions or perspectives.